Distributed Locking System - Scaling Considerations
Horizontal Scaling Limits
Cluster Size Constraints
Optimal Cluster Sizes:
- 3 nodes: Development, small scale
- 5 nodes: Production (recommended)
- 7 nodes: High availability
Why Not More?
- Consensus overhead increases with cluster size
- Write latency grows (more nodes to replicate)
- Network bandwidth increases
- Diminishing returns beyond 7 nodes
Quorum Requirements:
- 3 nodes: 2 for quorum (tolerates 1 failure)
- 5 nodes: 3 for quorum (tolerates 2 failures)
- 7 nodes: 4 for quorum (tolerates 3 failures)Read Scaling
Strategies:
1. Follower Reads (Stale):
- Read from any node
- May return stale data
- High throughput
2. Linearizable Reads:
- Read from leader only
- Always consistent
- Limited by leader capacity
3. Lease-Based Reads:
- Followers with read leases
- Bounded staleness
- Good balancePerformance Optimization
Batching Operations
Batch Lock Acquisitions:
- Group multiple lock requests
- Single Raft log entry
- Reduces consensus overhead
- 10x throughput improvement
Implementation:
- Client-side batching
- Server-side coalescing
- Configurable batch window (10ms)Connection Pooling
Client Connection Management:
- Pool size: 10-50 connections
- Connection reuse
- Health checking
- Automatic failoverGeographic Distribution
Multi-Datacenter Deployment
Challenges:
- High latency between DCs
- Network partitions
- Consistency vs availability
Solutions:
1. Single Cluster Across DCs:
- Strong consistency
- High write latency
- Suitable for <100ms RTT
2. Multiple Independent Clusters:
- Low latency per region
- No cross-region consistency
- Application-level coordinationThis scaling guide ensures the locking system can grow while maintaining performance and consistency.